In our society, few groups are as vulnerable as those living with disabilities, relying on governmental support for their care and assistance. Ideally, inclusive policies should ensure that aid reaches these individuals seamlessly at their doorstep. However, in our nation, the reality is starkly different. People with disabilities are forced to navigate a bureaucratic maze, moving from one government office to another, just to claim the rights that are constitutionally guaranteed to them. The national disability pension scheme is a glaring example of this discrepancy that exposes the systemic failure in our disability pension scheme.
The Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS), is the only national disability pension scheme in our country. The IGNDPS is a key element of India's National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP). Launched on August 15, 1995, and managed by the Ministry of Rural Development for the past 27 years, the NSAP aims to support Below Poverty Line (BPL) households during old age, disability, widowhood, and the death of a primary breadwinner.
The NSAP encompasses various subcategories of financial assistance, including the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS), Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS), and the Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS). Additionally, it offers the National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS), which provides a one-time financial aid to bereaved families upon the death of the primary breadwinner, and the Annapurna scheme, which ensures food security for eligible elderly individuals who are not covered under IGNOAPS. Despite these extensive provisions, the delivery of these benefits often falls short, failing to reach the very individuals they are meant to support.
Among the numerous flaws in the implementation of these social assistance schemes
In our society, few groups are as vulnerable as those living with disabilities, relying on governmental support for their care and assistance. Ideally, inclusive policies should ensure that aid reaches these individuals seamlessly at their doorstep. However, in our nation, the reality is starkly different. People with disabilities are forced to navigate a bureaucratic maze, moving from one government office to another, just to claim the rights that are constitutionally guaranteed to them. The national disability pension scheme is a glaring example of this discrepancy that exposes the systemic failure in our disability pension scheme.
The Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS), is the only national disability pension scheme in our country. The IGNDPS is a key element of India's National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP). Launched on August 15, 1995, and managed by the Ministry of Rural Development for the past 27 years, the NSAP aims to support Below Poverty Line (BPL) households during old age, disability, widowhood, and the death of a primary breadwinner.
The NSAP encompasses various subcategories of financial assistance, including the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS), Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS), and the Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS). Additionally, it offers the National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS), which provides a one-time financial aid to bereaved families upon the death of the primary breadwinner, and the Annapurna scheme, which ensures food security for eligible elderly individuals who are not covered under IGNOAPS. Despite these extensive provisions, the delivery of these benefits often falls short, failing to reach the very individuals they are meant to support.
Among the numerous flaws in the implementation of these social assistance schemes, our focus is on the Indira Gandhi National Disability Scheme (IGNDPS). Launched in February 2009 by the Ministry of Rural Development, this central government initiative aims to support disabled individuals in our country. The scheme provides a monthly pension to disabled people over 18 years old with a disability of 80% or more and belonging to the poverty line. The financial aid amounts to a meagre Rs. 300 per month, which increases to Rs. 500 per month once the beneficiary reaches the age of 80. While the intent behind the IGNDPS is commendable, the execution leaves much to be desired, often failing to offer substantial relief to those it aims to support.
We Have a Request for You: Keep Our Journalism Alive
We are a small, dedicated team at The Probe, committed to in-depth, slow journalism that dives deeper than daily headlines. We can't sustain our vital work without your support. Please consider contributing to our social impact projects: Support Us or Become a Member of The Probe. Even your smallest support will help us keep our journalism alive.
Firstly, the clause in the pension scheme that restricts eligibility to those with 80% or more disability is highly exclusionary. This narrow criterion leaves out a large portion of differently-abled individuals who desperately need financial support. Moreover, the central government allocates funds to States and Union Territories based on their Below Poverty Line (BPL) population, using population figures from the 2001 Census and the poverty ratio determined by the erstwhile Planning Commission in 2004-05. This raises two critical issues.
Why was the 2011 Census data not utilised? And, more importantly, the lack of a census post-2011 has further compounded the problem, excluding a vast segment of the BPL population. Consequently, individuals who have over 80% disability but lack the necessary authentication to prove their BPL status are left without pension benefits. This exclusion is not their fault but a direct result of the government's outdated data practices. By relying on obsolete census data, the government fails to include many who could have been rightful beneficiaries.
Trapped in Bureaucratic Quagmire
Stay informed with The Probe. Get original stories, exclusive insights, and thoughtful, in-depth analysis delivered straight to your phone. Join our WhatsApp channel now! Click the link to join: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaXEzAk90x2otXl7Lo0L
The actual implementation of the IGNDPS is nothing short of appalling. A 2023 report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (C&AG) on the performance audit of the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP), under which the IGNDPS falls, reveals the extent of this failure.
NSAP guidelines urge States and Union Territories to provide additional funds matching the central government's assistance to ensure a decent level of support for beneficiaries. However, the C&AG report notes that the central government's already inadequate contribution of Rs. 300 per month, increasing to Rs. 500 after the age of 80, remains insufficient for disabled individuals. Worse, several states, including Goa, Manipur, Nagaland, and Punjab, did not contribute a single rupee to this scheme. In many areas, the scheme wasn't implemented at all. For instance, between 2017 and 2021, the IGNDPS was non-existent in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Even in states like Goa, where it was implemented, the benefits were restricted to rural areas only.
The most shocking revelation is that implementing departments in 24 States and Union Territories failed to maintain BPL lists, a crucial requirement for determining eligibility under the NSAP. This negligence further increases the plight of people with disabilities, as they are left without the support they desperately need due to the systemic failures and lack of accountability within the government's administrative machinery.
The distribution of pensions under the IGNDPS has been plagued by significant delays and errors, compounding the struggles of beneficiaries. In Delhi, for instance, there were delays exceeding three years in the disbursement of disability pension. Shockingly, government auditors discovered during field audits that disability pension was being disbursed to ineligible individuals. According to IGNDPS criteria, beneficiaries must be over 18 years of age and have a disability level of 80% or more. However, the audit revealed that pensions were issued to minor people who don't match the criteria at all.
The guidelines also stipulate that states should organise camps at convenient locations to identify eligible beneficiaries, providing transportation free of cost. Despite clear cut guidelines on how this scheme must be run on the ground level, the audit uncovered numerous instances where individuals with undetermined or insufficient disability levels received pensions. Moreover, there were cases of overpayments, short payments, multiple payments, and even pensions being issued to deceased individuals. These errors indicate a complete breakdown in the scheme’s implementation and monitoring processes.
A fundamental flaw in the IGNDPS is the lack of effective oversight. The National Social Assistance Advisory Committee (NSAAC) was established at the national level to aid the Ministry of Rural Development in monitoring and evaluating the NSAP, advising on policy and implementation. NSAP guidelines recommended that the NSAAC meet at least twice a year. However, between 2017 and 2021, only three meetings were conducted. Additionally, social audits, aimed at promoting transparency, accountability, and public participation, were not carried out as determined.
In summary, the disability pension scheme of the government suffers from severe implementation and monitoring issues, leading to widespread failures in delivering the intended benefits to the disabled community. This scheme, designed to provide a safety net for the most vulnerable, has instead become a stark example of bureaucratic inefficiency and neglect.
The IGNDPS stands as the only national-level financial assistance program for people with disabilities. This vulnerable population, which deserves the utmost care and concern from the government, is instead subjected to insurmountable hurdles just to enrol in the scheme. When pensions do finally arrive, they are often too little, too late, and frequently delayed.
It's an indictment of our system that existing disability pension beneficiaries struggle to receive their dues, while tens of thousands more are excluded because they cannot prove their BPL status. The shame lies in the fact that the very framework designed to uplift the most vulnerable is failing them so profoundly.
Dive deeper with The Probe. For thoughtful analysis and in-depth stories directly to your phone, join our WhatsApp channel. Click and Connect with us Today: [WhatsApp Channel Link] 🔗
At The Probe, our commitment to social impact journalism is at the core of everything we do. Funded by well-meaning individuals from the public, our aim is to drive positive social change and make a real-world impact through the stories we report.
If you wish to support us, please visit our Truth Brigade page and contribute to a cause that resonates with you the most. It is through your support that we have been able to keep the flame of our journalism alive in these difficult times. Click link to support us to make a difference: https://theprobe.in/truth-brigade